Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201782›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Effects of nitrogen application rate and weak light post anthesis on the grain yield and starch physicochemical properties of soft wheat.

Tingting Yang, Abdul Rehman, Suhui Yan, Juan Chen, Jing Li, Xiao Zhang, Wenyang Li

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tingting YangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Functional Agriculture and Functional Food, Agronomy College of Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China.
Abdul RehmanAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Functional Agriculture and Functional Food, Agronomy College of Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China.
Suhui YanAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Functional Agriculture and Functional Food, Agronomy College of Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China.
Juan ChenAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Functional Agriculture and Functional Food, Agronomy College of Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China.
Jing LiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Functional Agriculture and Functional Food, Agronomy College of Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China.
Xiao ZhangKey Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Breeding in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River, Lixiahe Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu, Yangzhou, China.
Wenyang LiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Functional Agriculture and Functional Food, Agronomy College of Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effects of nitrogen (N) application rates and weak light treatment post anthesis on the grain yield and starch physicochemical characteristics of soft wheat. The soft wheat varieties Quanmai 725 (QM725) and Yangmai 15 (YM15) were used as study materials under field conditions, and the experiments were conducted during 2022-2023. During the grain filling stage (7-35 days post anthesis), three shading levels were set: 10% shading (S1), 20% shading (S2) and 30% shading (S3), with natural light conditions used as the control (CK). In 2023-2024, two N application rates (120 kg/hm

Indexed as

nitrogen application ratesoft wheatstarch contentstarch physicochemical propertiesweak lightyield

Identifiers

PMID40201782
PMCPMC11976573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.