ArticleOpen respiratory archives
What We Know to Date About Early Treatment With Biologics in Severe Asthma: A Scoping Review About the Use of Biologics in Severe Asthma and Possible Parallels With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond biomarkers: the role of clinical factors associated with biologic therapy response in severe asthma.Annals of medicine · 2026Observational
- Biologic effectiveness increases with earlier biologic initiation after severe asthma onset.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Clinical Remission is Achievable for Adult Patients with Severe Asthma Receiving Mepolizumab: A European Retrospective Chart Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Effect of Delayed Initiation of Mepolizumab on EXACTO Scale Scores, Clinical Remission SEPAR-REMAS Criteria, and Functional Outcomes in Uncontrolled Severe Asthma: A Real-World Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Association of Easier Biologic Access with Remission and Other Clinical Outcomes in Severe Asthma: A Global Real-World Study.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Assessing Physician Agreement in Biologic Therapy Initiation and Selection in Patients with Severe Asthma.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Theoretically, an early intervention with biologics in severe asthma (SA) patients may attenuate inflammatory processes and potentially halt disease progression and remodeling. Changing the approach to a more preventive one could alter the course of the disease, avoid its progression, and improve the likelihood of achieving clinical remission. The aims of this study were to gather scientific evidence on this topic, to draw a parallel between SA and rheumathoid arthritis (RA) and to analyze the potential benefits of establishing early treatment in SA. Material and methods: A systematic scoping review, conducted in accordance with the methodological guidance of the Arksey and O'Malley framework and focusing on early treatment intervention with biological drugs in SA and RA is presented. Results: Evidence supports the early intervention with biologics in RA to improve outcomes. Evidence regarding early intervention with biologics in SA is scarce. To date, the literature reviewed suggests that better clinical condition of the patient and more preserved lung function at the onset of biological treatment, together with a shorter duration of asthma, are associated with better response to biologics. Conclusions: Data suggests that the more preventive approach may lead to improved results. The scarcity of scientific evidence highlights the importance of pursuing this line of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.