ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Values characteristics of Chinese college students with upper-level learning engagement.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological detachment in Chinese higher education: a multitheoretical model of academic stress, cultural pressure, and coping resources.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Currently, much of the research on learning engagement has more underlined the individual factors associated with levels of learning engagement among college students, but the connections between individual values and learning engagement has not been definitively elucidated. The aim of this research is to reveal the relationships between individual values preferences and degrees of learning engagement, and mainly focuses on the individual values preferences of Chinese college students with upper-level learning engagement. Methods: Data from 360 first-year Chinese college students majored in foreign languages in Northeast China supported a two-cluster of students based on different learning engagement levels. The assignment of items in the UWES-S scale and the PVQ-21 scale was confirmed through a principal component method to identify the underlying dimensions of Chinese college students' learning engagement and values. A cluster analysis with K-means algorithm to cluster the participants based on their learning engagement levels. And a series of One-Way Analyses of Variance (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the differences between the cluster groups in relation to each of the values and mainly analyzed individual values characteristics of students with upper-level learning engagement. Results: Comparing values preferences of students with upper-level learning engagement and those with lower-level learning engagement, the results showed that students with upper-level learning engagement assigned more importance to "Social Focus" values, "Openness to Change" values, benevolence, and hedonism. Which presents a promising opportunity for future research to explore the potential impact of values education on students' learning engagement. Conclusion: This research enhances the comprehension of the intricate relationship between learning engagement and values and offers a potential avenue for further investigation into the potential impact of values education on students' learning engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.