Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201705›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2025

Ayurveda for Managing Noncommunicable Diseases in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Nations: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Patricia Egwumba, Haiquan Wang, Laura Nellums, Manpreet Bains, Kaushik Chattopadhyay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A scoping review of clinicalFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Ayurveda and Preventive Public Health in India: A Policy Perspective for Primary Health Care.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia EgwumbaLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.ORCID 0009-0008-4714-207X
Haiquan WangSchool of Exercise and Health Shanghai University of Sport Shanghai China.
Laura NellumsLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.
Manpreet BainsLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.
Kaushik ChattopadhyayLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3235-8168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ayurveda, a traditional system of medicine, has gained recognition in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries as a complementary and alternative medicine for managing noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). Qualitative studies have been conducted in various OECD countries regarding the use of Ayurveda for NCD management. However, no qualitative systematic review has been conducted on this topic. Aim: This review aimed to synthesize the experiences, perceptions, and perspectives of patients with NCDs and Ayurvedic practitioners on the use of Ayurveda for NCD management in OECD countries. Methods: The JBI qualitative systematic review guidelines were followed. Several databases were searched to identify published and unpublished qualitative studies. Results: Of the 18,541 records identified, 9 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Using the JBI checklist for qualitative research (10 criteria), the critical appraisal scores of the studies ranged from moderate to high quality. Patients turned to Ayurveda because of concerns about side effects and dissatisfaction with conventional Western treatments and were driven by the perceived gentleness and holistic qualities of Ayurveda. Complementing these patient insights, Ayurvedic practitioners emphasized that Ayurveda identifies and addresses the root causes of diseases rather than treating symptoms alone. Integration challenges, limited medication access, and regulatory constraints were identified as factors affecting Ayurveda's service delivery. Conclusions: Patients preferred Ayurveda because of its natural approach and fewer side effects, whereas Ayurvedic practitioners valued its holistic approach. However, its wider acceptance has been hampered by hurdles such as regulatory barriers and limited access to medicines. Strategies to overcome some of the barriers identified in this review as well as to promote the strengths discussed in this review may facilitate the effective use of Ayurveda to manage NCDs in OECD countries.

Indexed as

Ayurvedamanagementnoncommunicable diseasesOrganisation for Economic Cooperation and Developmentqualitative systematic review

Identifiers

PMID40201705
PMCPMC11976450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.