ArticleHealth science reports2025
A Low-Cost Alternative Technique for Eye Protection During Prone Positioning in Spinal Surgery.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although rare, anaesthetising patinets in prone position for spinal surgery carries a risk of serious complications. Among these, postoperative visual loss (POVL) is of significant concern. Preventing POVL requires close collaboration between spinal surgeons and anaesthetists. Methods: In our centre, we practiced a cost-effective method to ensure proper patient positioning, eye protection, and consistent assessment of eye position during prone spinal surgery. An affordable telescopic inspection mirror was used in conjunction with standard protective eye padding secured with sleek tape. This approach facilitated regular intraoperative eye checks without disrupting the surgical workflow. Results: The proposed approach offers an affordable and practical alternative to expensive commercial headrest options while maintaining effectiveness in reducing the risk of POVL. Conclusion: The method provides a viable, low-cost solution for mitigating POVL risk in prone-anaesthetised spinal surgery patients, highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary coordination and continuous monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.