ArticleHealth science reports2025
Proliferative Markers in Breast Cancer and Chemotherapy Implications: A Comprehensive Review.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging biomarkers in breast fibroadenoma: implications for differential diagnosis, malignant transformation, and precision medicine.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related death among women globally. Determining which patients will benefit from chemotherapy remains challenging. Proliferative markers such as Ki-67, mini chromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) offer valuable insights into tumor growth and treatment response. This review evaluates their clinical roles, with a focus on chemotherapy implications and emerging digital pathology techniques for marker quantification. Methods: A narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for studies related to Ki-67, MCM, PCNA, breast cancer, and chemotherapy. Studies were thematically categorized into five areas. A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2000 to April 2023 was performed using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer to assess research trends and thematic evolution. Results: Eighty studies were included in the narrative synthesis. Ki-67 is the most commonly used marker, particularly useful in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MCM proteins show promise for identifying proliferative potential across tumor grades, while PCNA is associated with aggressive tumor features and poor prognosis. Post-chemotherapy changes in Ki-67 levels are linked to survival outcomes. Bibliometric analysis revealed a shift in research focus from basic mechanisms to clinical applications and digital quantification. Conclusion: Proliferative markers play an essential role in breast cancer management. Ki-67 remains a key predictor of chemotherapy response, while MCM and PCNA offer complementary prognostic insights. Integration of these markers with digital pathology and AI-driven tools may enhance diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment strategies. Standardization of assessment methods is crucial for broader clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.