Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201664›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Thoracic fluid content as a novel and rapid diagnostic indicator of secondary capillary leak syndrome in pediatric patients post-cardiopulmonary bypass.

Junming Huo, Jie Cheng, Chengjun Liu, Yueqiang Fu, Feng Xu, Jing Li

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junming HuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jie ChengDepartment of Emergency, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chengjun LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yueqiang FuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Feng XuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) is an urgent problem in postoperative patients, is challenging to diagnose early, and has a poor prognosis. We investigated a quick and convenient diagnostic indicator of secondary CLS in children after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods: We conducted this single-center, observational, prospective study in the Department of Critical Care Medicine at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. All the data were collected within 24 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The secondary CLS risk factors were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the cut-off point of secondary CLS was found by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Our study included two hundred four pediatric patients in the PICU after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). 42.65% (87/204) of patients were diagnosed with secondary CLS. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 36.76% (75/204), and the mortality was 5.39% (11/204). Logistic analysis indicated that a pulmonary exudation on chest radiograph, a high thoracic fluid content (TFC) and a higher vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) were independent risk factors for secondary CLS [odds ratio [OR] 23.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.20-90.41, Conclusions: The TFC plays a key role in the early prediction of secondary CLS in children after CPB, and this novel indicator may help clinicians initiate intensive treatment as early as possible.

Indexed as

capillary leak syndrome (CLS)cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)childrenindicatorthoracic fluid content (TFC)

Identifiers

PMID40201664
PMCPMC11975871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.