Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201653›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

An interprofessional model for training the next generation of physician-researchers.

Susan Budinger, Theodore Snyderman, Christine Deeter, Camila Reyes, Joan Wilson, Holly Tiemann, Leonor Corsino, Kathryn Andolsek, Denise C Snyder, Stephanie Freel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Susan BudingerDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2748-4637
Theodore SnydermanDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Christine DeeterDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1466-4967
Camila ReyesDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Joan WilsonClinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Holly TiemannDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Leonor CorsinoDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-9097
Kathryn AndolsekDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Denise C SnyderDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-7433
Stephanie FreelDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-3271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential for physicians, clinicians, and health professionals to contribute to the advancement of medical therapies through clinical research is significant. Yet, a lack of exposure to, or practical training in, the conduct of clinical research can inhibit health profession trainees from considering research careers, thus perpetuating the already limited influx of new talent. To enhance the sustainability of career pathways into research for all trainees, including those from traditionally underrepresented communities, trainees must experience early exposure to research concepts through robust training and hands-on opportunities. In 2015, the Duke Office of Clinical Research created a Research Immersion elective for Duke's Master in Biomedical Sciences program, which prepares students for additional health professional training. The course trained students through didactic and practical experiences, with a unique interprofessional mentorship team including both principal investigator and clinical research professional mentors. Following eight cohorts of iterative course optimization, students' confidence increased in all 24 research competencies assessed. A cross-sectional analysis of post-course outcomes in May 2024 revealed 40.4% of students had continued in research after the program and 60.6% had continued their health professions education. We attributed this success to applied learning and clear expectations and guidelines to support the mentor-student relationship.

Indexed as

academic curriculumclinical researchmentorshipstudent educationWorkforce development

Identifiers

PMID40201653
PMCPMC11975781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.