Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201647›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Developing the engage for equity institutional multi-sector survey: Assessing academic institutional culture and climate for community-based participatory research (CBPR).

Elizabeth Dickson, Alena Kuhlemeier, Prajakta Adsul, Shannon Sanchez-Youngman, Katie Myers, Tabia Henry Akintobi, Lisa G Rosas, Jason A Mendoza, John Oetzel, Paige Castro-Reyes and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth DicksonUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, College of Population Health, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-368X
Alena KuhlemeierUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, College of Population Health, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Prajakta AdsulUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2860-4378
Shannon Sanchez-YoungmanUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, College of Population Health, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-8490
Katie MyersFull Circle Health Family Medicine Residency Program, Boise, ID, USA.
Tabia Henry AkintobiMorehouse School of Medicine, Prevention Research Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-7937
Lisa G RosasStanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-7972
Jason A MendozaUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
John OetzelThe University of Waikato, New Zealand School of Management and Marketing, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Paige Castro-ReyesCommunity-Campus Partnership for Health, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3545-3358
Christina AlanizUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, College of Population Health, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Belkis JacquezUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, College of Population Health, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Nina WallersteinUniversity of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, College of Population Health, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1969-0799

Funding

Translational Research Core - Engagement and Behavior ChangeP30DK111024 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Mohammed Kumail Ali · 2016 to 2026
$13.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006802NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Community-engaged research/community-based participatory research/patient-engaged research (CEnR/CBPR/PEnR) are increasingly recognized as important approaches for addressing health equity. However, there is limited support for CEnR/CBPR/PEnR within Academic Health Centers (AHCs). It is important for AHCs to measure and monitor the context, process, and policies in support for CEnR/CBPR/PEnR. The Methods: Working with "champion teams" consisting of academic leaders, researchers, and patient/community partners at each AHC, we developed the IMSS to assess the following domains: institutional mission, vision, and values; CEnR/CBPR/PEnR policies/practices; community processes/structures; function of formal community advisory boards; climate/culture for CEnR/CBPR; perceptions of institutional leadership for CEnR/CBPR/PEnR. The survey was piloted to a convenience sample of CEnR/CBPR/PEnR participants at each AHC site. Results: A sample aggregated across all sites consisting of community ( Conclusions: While limited by survey length and question adaptation, the findings contribute to identification of institutional barriers and facilitators to CEnR/CBPR/PEnR in AHCs. These findings are critically important to support and improve CEnR/CBPR/PEnR practice in academic institutions and to elevate community partner voices and needs for advancing community and patient partners' research.

Indexed as

academic health centercommunity-based participatory researchCTSAPatient- and community-engaged researchsurvey development

Identifiers

PMID40201647
PMCPMC11975786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.