Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201634›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Development of a job satisfaction measure for clinical research professionals: A mixed methods approach.

Jacqueline M Knapke, John Kues, Spencer K Harris, Denise C Snyder, Stephanie A Freel, Harini Pallerla, Jessica Fritter, Angela Mendell, Carolynn T Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacqueline M KnapkeCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-5629
John KuesCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-0913
Spencer K HarrisDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5938-3638
Denise C SnyderOffice of Clinical Research, Clinical Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1160-7433
Stephanie A FreelOffice of Clinical Research, Clinical Translational Science Institute, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-3271
Harini PallerlaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2539-905X
Jessica FritterCollege of Nursing, College of Medicine, Center for Clinical Translational Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-4979
Angela MendellCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-9479
Carolynn T JonesCollege of Nursing, College of Medicine, Center for Clinical Translational Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-7860

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUM1TR004548 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CYNTHIA A GERHARDT, JULIE A. JOHNSON · 2023 to 2026
$22.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical research professionals (CRPs) are essential members of research teams serving in multiple job roles. However, recent turnover rates have reached crisis proportions, negatively impacting clinical trial metrics. Gaining an understanding of job satisfaction factors among CRPs working at academic medical centers (AMCs) can provide insights into retention efforts. Materials/Methods: A survey instrument was developed to measure key factors related to CRP job satisfaction and retention. The survey included 47 rating items in addition to demographic questions. An open-text question solicited respondents to provide their top three factors for job satisfaction. The survey was distributed through listservs of three large AMCs. Here, we present a factor analysis of the instrument and quantitative and qualitative results of the subsequent survey. Results: A total of 484 CRPs responded to the survey. A principal components analysis with Varimax rotation was performed on the 47 rating items. The analysis resulted in seven key factors and the survey instrument was reduced to 25 rating items. Self-efficacy and pride in work were top ranked in the quantitative results; work complexity and stress and salary and benefits were top ranked in the qualitative findings. Opportunities for education and professional development were also themes in the qualitative data. Discussion: This study addresses the need for a tool to measure job satisfaction of CRPs. This tool may be useful for additional validation studies and research to measure the effectiveness of improvement initiatives to address CRP job satisfaction and retention.

Indexed as

Clinical research professionalfactor analysisjob satisfactionprincipal components analysisretentionworkforce development

Identifiers

PMID40201634
PMCPMC11975783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.