Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201633›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention.

Stephen Molldrem, Heidi Luft, Jeffrey S Farroni, Elizabeth J Lyons, Kevin Wooten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen MolldremInstitute for Bioethics and Health Humanities, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1907-8081
Heidi LuftInstitute for Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-9050
Jeffrey S FarroniInstitute for Bioethics and Health Humanities, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Elizabeth J LyonsInstitute for Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Kevin WootenInstitute for Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-8585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Team Methods to Advance Processes and Performance in Science (TeamMAPPS) is an evidence-based Team Science competency model and intervention. TeamMAPPS was developed by experts in the Science of Team Science with translational teams in mind. TeamMAPPS focuses on three core teamwork competencies: (1) psychological safety, (2) awareness and exchange, and (3) self-correction and adaptation. In 2023, the TeamMAPPS framework was operationalized into five online training modules that can be used to train whole teams or individuals, with or without facilitation, in any order. This article reports formative findings from the pre-implementation stage of the TeamMAPPS Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) study. Methods: We conducted 27 interviews and participant-observation fieldwork with 23 individuals involved in the conceptualization, design, or implementation of TeamMAPPS (four were interviewed twice). All implementers were affiliated with a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hub. Data were collected during pre-implementation, when modules were being tested and early-stage implementers were being trained. We used D&I theories and frameworks to structure the study, analyze interview data, and recommend implementation strategies. Findings: "Adoption," "reach," and "effectiveness" emerged as key implementation outcomes. TeamMAPPS was perceived to be evidence-based, highly adaptable, and a Team Science intervention offering unique benefits. We draw on participants' responses and expert recommendations to suggest implementation strategies. Conclusions: CTSAs and other organizations can use varied strategies to implement TeamMAPPS. The flexibility of the intervention and its rootedness in an evidence-base synthesized by Team Science leaders make TeamMAPPS appealing for CTSAs seeking to enhance their team training offerings.

Indexed as

CTSAdissemination and implementation scienceimplementation sciencescience of team scienceTeam scienceteam trainings

Identifiers

PMID40201633
PMCPMC11975785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.