Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201622›Full record

ArticleTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2025

Influence of the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on the Hemostatic Potential of Blood Plasma.

Irina Patalakh, Alexandra Wandersee, Julian Schlüter, Michael Erdmann, Holger Hackstein, Sarah Cunningham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hemostasis at the edge between physiology and cancer.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irina PatalakhDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostaseology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Alexandra WanderseeDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostaseology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Julian SchlüterDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostaseology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael ErdmannDepartment of Dermatology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Holger HacksteinDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostaseology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Sarah CunninghamDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Hemostaseology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized classical treatment approaches of various cancer entities, but are also associated with a number of side effects. One of these may be life-threatening clotting disorders with the risk of thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications, the mechanisms of which are still poorly understood. In the present study, we analyzed the direct effects of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab on platelet aggregation as well as plasma coagulation followed by fibrinolysis in an ex vivo model. Methods: Microplate spectrometry was used to analyze aggregation, coagulation, and fibrinolysis in platelet-free (PFP) and platelet-rich (PRP) healthy donor plasma samples treated with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, and appropriate isotype controls. Aggregation was induced by TRAP-6. Clotting of PFP and PRP followed by lysis was initiated with a tissue factor in a mixture of phosphatidylserine:phosphatidylcholine and the addition of t-PA. Among other parameters, the area under the curve (AUC) was used to compare the effect of ICIs on aggregation, coagulation, and fibrinolysis. Results: Upon direct contact with platelets, pembrolizumab stimulated platelet aggregation in PRP, while nivolumab and ipilimumab promoted disaggregation with corresponding changes in the AUC. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab, both PD-1 receptor inhibitors, had no effect on the plasma coagulation cascade. Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 receptor inhibitor, significantly increased the rate of PRP clotting. When clotting was followed by lysis, all ICIs were found to prolong the growth of the PRP-derived fibrin clot and delay its elimination. This was manifested by an increase in AUC relative to control PRP. Conclusion: This study characterizes the potential impact of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab on hemostasis. Nivolumab and ipilimumab are able to reduce aggregation and increase the procoagulant properties of platelets, which can cause side effects associated with hemostatic imbalance leading to thrombosis or bleeding. The observed ICI-specific effects may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms by which ICI affects platelets and suggest how, in a clinical setting, to reduce coagulation disorders during ICI treatment in the future.

Indexed as

AggregationCoagulationFibrinolysisImmune checkpoint inhibitorsPlatelet-rich plasmaPlateletsThrombocytes

Identifiers

PMID40201622
PMCPMC11975347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.