ArticleAJOG global reports2025
Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cesarean delivery rates in the United States far exceed the World Health Organization (WHO)'s recommended population cesarean rate of 15%. This has resulted in calls from experts to reduce cesarean delivery rates. However, crude cesarean delivery rates are not necessarily comparable across populations since different birthing populations have different distributions of underlying cesarean delivery risk factors. WHO recommends using the Robson classification system to compare standardized cesarean delivery rates across populations, though it has been rarely used within the U.S. Objective: The objectives of this study were to understand the distribution of cesarean deliveries using the Robson Classification system and to identify associated conditions (and potential drivers) of cesarean delivery across Robson groups. Study Design: Our data comes from the Pregnancy and Early Life Longitudinal Data System from the Massachusetts Department of Health, which contains all birth certificate records for Massachusetts from 2011 to 2018. Using the WHO Robson Classification System Implementation guide, we categorized births into one of its 10 categories based on data from birth certificate records and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes from billing records. Using the linked birth certificate records and hospital discharge records we went beyond the Robson classifications and examined patterns in maternal comorbidities and labor and delivery complications of cesarean deliveries across Robson groups. Results: Among the 25% of birthing people who had singleton, term, vertex births with spontaneous labor, the cesarean delivery rate was 15% for nulliparous and 3% for multiparous (with no prior cesarean). The prevalence of maternal risk factors was 28% in the former and 30% in the latter. Labor and delivery complications were present in 46% and 35% of births, respectively. Birthing people with breech or transverse fetal presentation had the highest cesarean delivery rates around 95%. Multiparous birthing people with a prior cesarean delivery and cephalic, singleton, term births were the largest contributor to the cesarean delivery rate (38% of all cesareans). Almost all births for malpresentation or malposition of fetus had at least one labor and delivery complication but much lower rates of risk factors (between 25% and 46%). Conclusion: While cesarean delivery rates, maternal risk factors, and labor and delivery complications followed similar patterns across Robson groups, there were notable discrepancies, especially in births with noncephalic presentations where maternal comorbidity rates matched lower cesarean-risk groups like the nulliparous single-term cephalic births.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.