ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
An ideal portrait of the professional competence of clinical research nurses: A qualitative study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a nursing internship system through institutional collaboration: current status, challenges, and optimization pathways.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026Article
- An exploration and analysis of the role positioning, duty comparison, and career development path of clinical research nurses in developed and developing countries.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to identify and define the ideal professional competencies of Clinical Research Nurses (CRNs) in China, focusing on the essential knowledge, skills, and personal attributes required for effective practice in clinical trials. Methods: Interviews were conducted with CRNs, Nurse Managers (NMs), Principal Investigators (PIs), Sub-Investigators (SIs), Clinical Research Coordinators (CRCs), Clinical Research Associates (CRAs), and subjects. Thematic analysis was performed using Colaizzi's seven-step method to analyze interview data and identify key competencies. Results: The study identified four primary themes that characterize the ideal CRN profile: (1) theoretical knowledge ability, (2) practical technical ability, (3) professional quality and ability, and (4) personal traits. A total of 21 specific indicators were delineated, reflecting the diverse expectations of various stakeholders in clinical trials. Conclusions: The findings highlight the multifaceted nature of CRN competencies, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive training programs tailored to the needs of CRNs. This study provides a foundational framework for enhancing CRN training and professional development in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.