Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201531›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025

Artificial intelligence-assisted machine learning models for predicting lung cancer survival.

Yue Yuan, Guolong Zhang, Yuqi Gu, Sicheng Hao, Chen Huang, Hongxia Xie, Wei Mi, Yingchun Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Large Language Models in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yue YuanSchool of Nursing, Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China.
Guolong ZhangRespiratory Intervention Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuqi GuSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, China.
Sicheng HaoInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Chen HuangNursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Hongxia XieSchool of Computing Sciences, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, China.
Wei MiSchool of Nursing, Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China.
Yingchun ZengAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of large language model-Advanced Data Analysis (ADA) in developing and implementing machine learning models to predict survival outcomes for lung cancer patients, with a focus on its implications for nursing practice. Methods: A retrospective study design was employed using a dataset of lung cancer patients. Data included sociodemographic, clinical, treatment-specific, and comorbidity variables. Large language model-ADA was used to build and evaluate three machine learning models. Model performance was validated, and results were presented using calibration plots. Results: Of 737 patients, the survival rate of this cohort was 73.3%, with a mean age of 59.32 years. Calibration plots indicated robust model reliability across all models. The Random Forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy among the models. Most critical features identified were preoperative white blood cells (2.2%), preoperative lung function of Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (2.1%), preoperative arterial oxygen saturation (1.9%), preoperative partial pressure of oxygen (1.7%), preoperative albumin (1.6%), preoperative preparation time (1.5%), age at admission (1.5%), preoperative partial pressure of carbon dioxide (1.5%), preoperative hospital stay days (1.5%), and postoperative total days of thoracic tube drainage (1.4%). Conclusions: Large language model-ADA effectively facilitates the development of machine learning models for lung cancer survival prediction, enabling non-technical health care professionals to harness the power of advanced analytics. The findings underscore the importance of preoperative factors in predicting outcomes, while also highlighting the need for external validation across diverse settings.

Indexed as

Large language modelLung cancer survivalNursing decision-makingPredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID40201531
PMCPMC11976224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.