ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted machine learning models for predicting lung cancer survival.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Models in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative predictive performance of three machine learning algorithms for acute radiation enteritis risk among patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A prospective cohort study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Merging artificial intelligence into cancer nursing care: Current applications, challenges, and opportunities.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Bronchovascular Modelling in Sublobar Pulmonary Resection: A Tool for Personalised Thoracic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Predicting 5-Year Mortality in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using the Korean Central Cancer Registry: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: a narrative review of clinical advances and applications in 2025.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning for presurgical differentiation of Hürthle cell carcinoma and adenoma: a SHAP-augmented approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- An interpretable nomogram for predicting early acute postoperative hypocalcemia in differentiated thyroid cancer: development and internal validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Using Radiomics and Explainable Ensemble Learning to Predict Radiation Pneumonitis and Survival in NSCLC Patients Post-VMAT.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The incremental value of unstructured data via natural language processing in machine learning-based COVID-19 mortality prediction: a comparative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of large language model-Advanced Data Analysis (ADA) in developing and implementing machine learning models to predict survival outcomes for lung cancer patients, with a focus on its implications for nursing practice. Methods: A retrospective study design was employed using a dataset of lung cancer patients. Data included sociodemographic, clinical, treatment-specific, and comorbidity variables. Large language model-ADA was used to build and evaluate three machine learning models. Model performance was validated, and results were presented using calibration plots. Results: Of 737 patients, the survival rate of this cohort was 73.3%, with a mean age of 59.32 years. Calibration plots indicated robust model reliability across all models. The Random Forest model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy among the models. Most critical features identified were preoperative white blood cells (2.2%), preoperative lung function of Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (2.1%), preoperative arterial oxygen saturation (1.9%), preoperative partial pressure of oxygen (1.7%), preoperative albumin (1.6%), preoperative preparation time (1.5%), age at admission (1.5%), preoperative partial pressure of carbon dioxide (1.5%), preoperative hospital stay days (1.5%), and postoperative total days of thoracic tube drainage (1.4%). Conclusions: Large language model-ADA effectively facilitates the development of machine learning models for lung cancer survival prediction, enabling non-technical health care professionals to harness the power of advanced analytics. The findings underscore the importance of preoperative factors in predicting outcomes, while also highlighting the need for external validation across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.