Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201383›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2025

Striatal function scrutinized through the PAN-TAN-FSI triumvirate.

Paul Apicella, Anne-Caroline Martel, Kevin Marche

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul ApicellaInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Anne-Caroline MartelInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Kevin MarcheInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the information encoded by distinct components of the neuronal circuitry in the striatum represents an avenue for elucidating the role of this subcortical region in adaptive behavior and its dysfunction in pathological conditions. In behaving animals, conventional single neuron recordings generally differentiated between three main electrophysiologically identified neuron subtypes in the striatum, referred to as phasically active neurons (PANs), tonically active neurons (TANs), and fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs), assumed to correspond to GABAergic spiny projection neurons, cholinergic interneurons, and parvalbumin-containing GABAergic interneurons, respectively. Considerable research has been devoted to exploring the behavior-related activities of neurons classified electrophysiologically into PANs, TANs, and FSIs in animals engaged in task performance, mostly monkeys. Although precise neuron identification remains a major challenge, such electrophysiological studies have provided insights into the functional properties of presumed distinct striatal neuronal populations. In this review, we will focus on current ideas about the functions subserved by these neuron subtypes, emphasizing their link to specific aspects of behaviors. We will also underline the issues that are yet to be resolved regarding the classification of striatal neurons into distinct subgroups which emphasize the importance of considering the potential overlap among electrophysiological characteristics and the molecular diversity of neuron types in the striatum.

Indexed as

basal gangliabehaviormonkeyneuron typessingle-unit

Identifiers

PMID40201383
PMCPMC11975669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.