ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Discovery of a DNA repair-associated radiosensitivity index for predicting radiotherapy efficacy in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of breast cancer (BRCA) treatment. Accurately predicting tumor radiosensitivity is critical for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and personalizing treatment strategies. DNA repair pathways are key determinants of radiotherapy response. Thus, we aimed to develop a novel DNA repair-related radiosensitivity model and to identify potential targets for enhancing radiotherapy efficacy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using data from 942 BRCA patients from TCGA database. A radiosensitivity model, comprising a radiosensitivity index, was developed using LASSO regression analysis. Patients were stratified into radiosensitive (RS) and radioresistant (RR) groups based on their radiosensitivity index (RSI). Associations between the RSI, clinicopathological parameters, and PD-L1 status were analyzed. The CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms were employed to characterize the immune landscape of the tumor microenvironment. The Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) algorithm and pRRophetic platform were used to predict treatment responses. Key genes identified in the radiosensitivity model were further validated using Results: We successfully constructed a radiosensitivity index incorporating 10 DNA repair-related genes. Patients in the RS group exhibited significantly better prognosis compared to the RR group, but this benefit was limited to those receiving radiotherapy. This survival benefit associated with the radiosensitivity signature was absent in patients who did not receive radiotherapy. The RS group displayed a distinct molecular profile characterized by enrichment of TGF-β signaling and protein secretion pathways, potentially contributing to enhanced radiosensitivity. Furthermore, the RS group exhibited increased infiltration of immune cells. Notably, the RS-PD-L1-high subgroup demonstrated the most favorable survival outcomes and highest immune cell infiltration, highlighting their potential responsiveness to immunotherapy. In addition, the RR group exhibited a distinct profile characterized by enrichment of DNA repair pathways and a heightened sensitivity to CDK and HER2 inhibitors. Conversely, this group displayed resistance to DNA-damaging drugs. These findings were supported by Conclusion: In conclusion, we established a radiosensitivity model for predicting radiotherapy benefit in breast cancer. Our study reveals a strong association between radiosensitivity, enhanced antitumor immunity, and potential immunotherapy benefit, particularly within the RS-PD-L1-high subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.