Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201339›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2025

Deep learning-based automated segmentation and quantification of the dural sac cross-sectional area in lumbar spine MRI.

George Ghobrial, Christian Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George GhobrialClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide, Bremerhaven, Germany.
Christian RothClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte/Bremen-Ost, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a critical role in diagnosing and planning treatment for spinal conditions such as degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, and disc herniation. Measuring the cross-sectional area of the dural sac (DSCA) is a key factor in evaluating the severity of spinal canal narrowing. Traditionally, radiologists perform this measurement manually, which is both time-consuming and susceptible to errors. Advances in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) like the U-Net architecture, have demonstrated significant potential in the analysis of medical images. This study evaluates the efficacy of deep learning models for automating DSCA measurements in lumbar spine MRIs to enhance diagnostic precision and alleviate the workload of radiologists. Methods: For algorithm development and assessment, we utilized two extensive, anonymized online datasets: the "Lumbar Spine MRI Dataset" and the SPIDER-MRI dataset. The combined dataset comprised 683 lumbar spine MRI scans for training and testing, with an additional 50 scans reserved for external validation. We implemented and assessed three deep learning models-U-Net, Attention U-Net, and MultiResUNet-using 5-fold cross-validation. The models were trained on T1-weighted axial MRI images and evaluated on metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and mean absolute error (MAE). Results: All models exhibited a high correlation between predicted and actual DSCA values. The MultiResUNet model achieved superior results, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9917 and an MAE of 23.7032 mm Discussion: This study demonstrates that deep learning models, particularly MultiResUNet, offer high accuracy and reliability in the automated segmentation and calculation of DSCA in lumbar spine MRIs. These models hold significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing the workload of radiologists. Despite some limitations, such as the restricted dataset size and reliance on T1-weighted images, this study provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning in medical imaging. Future research should include larger, more diverse datasets and additional image weightings to further validate and enhance the generalizability and clinical utility of these models.

Indexed as

automated diagnosisdeep learningdural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA)lumbar spine MRImedical image segmentationMultiResUNetradiological assessmentspinal canal stenosis

Identifiers

PMID40201339
PMCPMC11975661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.