ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Perspectives in clinical research on Azathioprine for steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prodrug Strategies in Atherosclerosis: Targeted Delivery and Therapeutic Advances.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Review
- Review
- A Rare Case of Cold Antibody-Mediated Autoimmune Haemolytic Anaemia in Early Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Cureus · 2025Article
- Surgeons Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Preoperative Inflammatory Bowel Disease Medications and Post-Operative Complications.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the application of Azathioprine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and the challenges associated with its long-term use. While short-term studies demonstrate the efficacy of Azathioprine in steroid-dependent UC, long-term data on its risks, including malignancies, infections, and chronic toxicity, remain insufficient. Furthermore, the impact of Azathioprine on patients' quality of life over extended periods is still unclear. The research highlights the importance of optimizing Azathioprine dosing based on genomic data, particularly through TPMT and NUDT15 genotyping, to minimize adverse effects. However, further research is needed to develop individualized treatment strategies that can improve efficacy and reduce toxicity. The identification of predictive biomarkers, through genomics and proteomics, is likely to play a crucial role in improving treatment precision by identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from Azathioprine therapy. Additionally, combining Azathioprine with biologic therapies (such as anti-TNF agents or integrin inhibitors) and interventions targeting the gut microbiome may enhance the drug's effectiveness while reducing reliance on steroids. Overall, large-scale clinical trials are urgently needed to evaluate the benefits and risks of these emerging therapies, ultimately supporting more personalized treatment approaches for steroid-dependent UC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.