Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201319›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

One-year changes in axial length and refraction in children using low-level red light and distant-image screen for myopia control: a randomized controlled trial.

Ke Yang, Yuhan Wang, Xiaoxia Li, Sumeng Liu, Hui Shi, Liya Qiao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06683287 (Effects of Low-Level Red Light and Distant-Image Screen for Myopia Control in Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06683287 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Low-Level Red Light and Distant-Image Screen for Myopia Control in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tongren HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsMyopiaArmsred light and distant image screen, red light, distant image screen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ke YangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuhan WangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxia LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Sumeng LiuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hui ShiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liya QiaoBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of 650-nm low-level red light (RL) and distant-image therapy (DIT) for myopia. Methods: A randomized clinical trial. Children aged 8-10 years with a spherical equivalent error (SER) ranging from -1 to -1.5 diopters (D) were enrolled, and were randomly allocated to the following group: RL, DIT, RL + DIT, and control in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. The primary outcomes were changes in SER and axial length (AL). Results: One hundred and sixteen children randomized, girls accounted for 45.69% (53/116). The median one-year changes in SER were 0.21D (inter-quartile range, IQR: -0.03D to 0.46D), -0.06D (-0.32D to 0.19D), -0.08D (-0.31D to 0.14D), and -0.30D (-0.51D to -0.09D), respectively, for the RL + DIT, RL, DIT, and the control group. The median one-year changes in AL were 0.04 mm (-0.03 mm to 0.13 mm), 0.05 mm (-0.03 mm to 0.14 mm), 0.30 mm (0.22 mm to 0.37 mm), and 0.42 mm (0.35 mm to 0.49 mm), respectively, for the RL + DIT, RL, DIT, and the control group. Fundus photographs revealed no retinal changes across all groups. Conclusion: Participants who underwent daily 650-nm low-level red light therapy combined with distant-image screen intervention for 12 months demonstrated a significant deceleration in myopia progression, with 79.3% exhibiting potential for reversal of myopia. No safety concerns were identified through OCT and fundus photography. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06683287.

Indexed as

axial length reductiondistant-image therapymyopia controlmyopia regressionred light therapy

Identifiers

PMID40201319
PMCPMC11977516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.