ArticleUS cardiology2025
Anomalous Origin of Coronary Arteries: A Diagnostic Dilemma.
Article in US cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increasing use of imaging for screening and diagnostic purposes, particularly coronary CT angiography, the number of adult patients diagnosed with anomalous origin of the coronary arteries (AOCA) has risen significantly. While current guidelines offer a general framework for managing and treating AOCA, patients present with diverse anomalies, symptoms, and clinical presentations, making broad recommendations less universally applicable. Notably, a wide range of treatment options exists, but there is no clear consensus on the best intervention strategy. Presented here are three cases of AOCA emphasizing the anatomical variations, clinical presentations, and the utility of coronary CT angiography in delineating anatomy and identifying high-risk features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.