Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201304›Full record

ReviewUS cardiology2025

Cardio-obstetrics in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: An Introductory Guide.

Jenna Skowronski, Eleanor Christenson, Kayle Shapero, Anaïs Hausvater, Ann Gage, Arun Jeyabalan, Kathryn Berlacher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in US cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jenna SkowronskiDepartment of Cardiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, TN.
Eleanor ChristensonHeart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA.
Kayle ShaperoLifespan, Cardiovascular Institute, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University Providence, RI.
Anaïs HausvaterSarah Ross Soter Center for Women's Cardiovascular Research, Leon H Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York, NY.
Ann GageDepartment of Cardiology, Centennial Heart, Centennial Medical Center Nashville, TN.
Arun JeyabalanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA.
Kathryn BerlacherHeart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The care of the cardio-obstetric population in the cardiac intensive care unit is challenging due to limited data in this patient population. Optimal care requires a broad multidisciplinary team of experts such that both maternal and fetal health are fully supported. A deep understanding of the interplay between the hemodynamics of pregnancy and the clinical manifestations of varied cardiac disease states is essential. The assessment, diagnostic testing, and treatment of patients who are pregnant require special consideration, especially as teams consider pharmacological and invasive therapies. Complex ethical decisions often arise and therapies may be limited by federal and state policy, which adds an additional layer of complexity. This review serves as an introductory guide to cardio-obstetric care in the cardiac intensive care unit.

Indexed as

cardiac critical careCardio-obstetricsethicsmechanical circulatory supportmultidisciplinary carepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40201304
PMCPMC11976738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.