Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201219›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2025

The stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Arkansas: a checklist compiled from museum specimen data.

Lily Veronica Hart, Ralph Edward DeWalt, Phillip N Hogan, Scott A Grubbs, David K Burton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lily Veronica HartDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, United States of America Department of Entomology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-1849
Ralph Edward DeWaltIllinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, United States of America Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9985-9250
Phillip N HoganDepartment of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, United States of America Department of Entomology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-272X
Scott A GrubbsDepartment of Biology and Center for Biodiversity Studies, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, United States of America Department of Biology and Center for Biodiversity Studies, Western Kentucky University Bowling Green United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2170-9716
David K BurtonCanadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, Canada Canadian National Collection of Insects Ottawa Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8582-7166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stoneflies are well known as indicators of water quality. Their presence in running waters, glacial meltwaters, and large oligotrophic lakes is rapidly declining the world over. In the USA, states partner with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect habitat and wildlife through the development of State Wildlife Action Plans (SWAPs). Plants and wildlife species often enter these SWAPs as Species in Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN). Arkansas currently lists nine stonefly species as SGCNs and has funded research on them through SWAP grants. However, these nine species were initially chosen based on the small amount of data from a few papers. A more comprehensive assessment using museum specimen data is necessary to assess completeness of sampling, the relative rarity and endemicity of species, temporal changes in distribution, and the conservation status of species in Arkansas. Herein, we publish a data paper and preliminary dataset comprised of specimen data primarily from the Illinois Natural History Survey Insect Collection, Canadian National Collection, Western Kentucky University, P. N. Hogan Personal Collection, and from existing literature sources. These data are made publicly available by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) to allow for comprehensive assessment of the Arkansas Plecoptera assemblage. More recent occurrence data are needed to accurately assess imperilment of Arkansas stonefly species; these data will be provided through targeted collecting, collaboration with others in Arkansas, and through investigation of additional museum collections. New information: This dataset includes > 3,500 specimen records (ethanol vials or pins with or without catalog numbers) and accounts for 84 stonefly species in Arkansas, six more species than indicated in published records. Perlidae contributed 29 of these species followed distantly by Perlodidae (15), Capniidae (14), Taeniopterygidae (9), Leuctridae (7), Chloroperlidae (5), Nemouridae (4), and Pteronarcyidae (1). A species accumulation curve predicts that sampling of species is nearly complete with a Chao1 estimate of 88.0 ± 3.7 species. Our data demonstrate that 25 species are known from ≤ five records, suggesting that many more than the nine recognized stonefly SGCNs in Arkansas may meet standards for inclusion.

Indexed as

aquatic insectsbiodiversitySpecies of Greatest Conservation NeedState Wildlife Action PlanTaxonWorks

Identifiers

PMID40201219
PMCPMC11976157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.