ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Dynamic spatio-temporal pruning for efficient spiking neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attribution-based Sparse Activation in Large Language Models.Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems ... · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spiking neural networks (SNNs), which draw from biological neuron models, have the potential to improve the computational efficiency of artificial neural networks (ANNs) due to their event-driven nature and sparse data flow. SNNs rely on dynamical sparsity, in that neurons are trained to activate sparsely to minimize data communication. This is critical when accounting for hardware given the bandwidth limitations between memory and processor. Given that neurons are sparsely activated, weights are less frequently accessed, and potentially can be pruned to less performance degradation in a SNN compared to an equivalent ANN counterpart. Reducing the number of synaptic connections between neurons also relaxes memory demands for neuromorphic processors. In this paper, we propose a spatio-temporal pruning algorithm that dynamically adapts to reduce the temporal redundancy that often exists in SNNs when processing Dynamic Vision Sensor (DVS) datasets. Spatial pruning is executed based on both global parameter statistics and inter-layer parameter count and is shown to reduce model degradation under extreme sparsity. We provide an ablation study that isolates the various components of spatio-temporal pruning, and find that our approach achieves excellent performance across all datasets, with especially high performance on datasets with time-varying features. We achieved a 0.69% improvement on the DVS128 Gesture dataset, despite the common expectation that pruning typically degrades performance. Notably, this enhancement comes with an impressive 98.18% reduction in parameter space and a 50% reduction in time redundancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.