Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201171›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025

Effects of isolated, confined and extreme environments on parameters of the immune system - a systematic review.

Bea Klos, Alina Kaul, Emily Straube, Verena Steinhauser, Celina Gödel, Franziska Schäfer, Claude Lambert, Paul Enck, Isabelle Mack

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bea KlosInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Alina KaulInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Emily StraubeInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Verena SteinhauserInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Celina GödelInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Franziska SchäferInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Claude LambertCytometry Unit, Immunology Laboratory, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Étienne, Lyon, France.
Paul EnckInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Isabelle MackInternal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The immune system is a crucial part of the body's defense against infection and disease. However, individuals in antigen-limited environments face unique challenges that can weaken their immune systems. This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of an exposure to an isolated, confined and extreme (ICE) environment with limited antigen diversity on human immune parameters. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies on immune system parameters in ICE environments. The studies were grouped by ICE type (space missions, microgravity simulations like bed rest studies, space simulation units like MARS500, and Antarctic research stations) to allow for clearer comparison and analysis of immune outcomes. Results: Analysis of 140 studies revealed considerable heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes, reflecting the complexity of immune responses across ICE environments. Nevertheless, immune dysregulation was consistently observed across environments. Space missions and Antarctic stations, in particular, showed pronounced immune changes, likely due to low antigen diversity and extreme conditions, with higher rates of infections and allergic responses suggesting increased vulnerability. Space simulation units exhibited immune changes similar to those in actual space missions, while gravity simulation studies, which focus on fluid shifts and bone loss, showed fewer immune alterations. Across environments, most immunological measures returned to baseline after isolation, indicating resilience and the potential for recovery upon re-exposure to diverse antigens. Conclusion: Reduced antigen diversity in ICE environments disrupts immune function, with effects often compounded by extreme conditions. Although immune resilience and recovery post-isolation are promising, the heterogeneity in current studies highlights the need for targeted research to identify specific immune vulnerabilities and to develop countermeasures. Such measures could reduce immune-related health risks for individuals in isolated settings, including astronauts, polar researchers, and vulnerable populations on Earth, such as the elderly or immunocompromised, thereby enhancing resilience in confined environments. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023476132.

Indexed as

Confined SpacesExtreme EnvironmentsImmune SystemHumansSpace FlightSpace Simulationantigen diversityantigen-limited environmentsbed restICE environmentsimmune dysregulationimmune systemresiliencespace analogues

Identifiers

PMID40201171
PMCPMC11975566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.