Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201110›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2025

Pregnancy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Narrative Review.

Martin Hecker, Anne Heihoff-Klose, Matthias Mehdorn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin HeckerDepartment of Medicine (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology), University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Anne Heihoff-KloseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthias MehdornDepartment of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) peaks in the fertile age of both women and men. There is a significant lack of knowledge regarding disease-specific aspects of guiding IBD patients through conception, pregnancy, and delivery in clinical routine. Summary: Patients with IBD often remain voluntarily childless, primarily due to a lack of knowledge. Fertility is generally unaffected in IBD patients, except in those with high disease activity or who have undergone specific abdominal surgeries that may lead to changes in the abdominal cavity, such as inflammatory or postoperative adhesions. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory medications are generally considered safe during pregnancy and should be continued to reduce the likelihood of relapses. If flares occur, close monitoring of the mother and the fetus is mandatory, and therapeutic options (conservative, interventional, surgical) have to be weighed thoroughly. Despite advances in treatment, IBD patients remain at increased risk of preterm labor, small-for-gestational-age newborns and are at risk of C-sections, although the current literature suggests vaginal delivery is possible for most patients. C-sections are recommended in patients with active perianal disease. Key Messages: Patients with IBD wishing to conceive should receive comprehensive preconception counseling about pregnancy-specific aspects of IBD management from an interdisciplinary team of specialists, including IBD gastroenterologists, obstetricians, and colorectal surgeons.

Indexed as

FertilityImmunosuppressive medicationInflammatory bowel diseaseInflammatory bowel disease surgeryPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40201110
PMCPMC11975342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.