Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201103›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2025

Suppression of an accessory and cavitated uterine mass with norethindrone: a case report.

Hope Knochenhauer, Lili Mohebbi, Eric Knochenhauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hope KnochenhauerNorthwell, New Hyde Park, New York.
Lili MohebbiNorthwell, New Hyde Park, New York.
Eric KnochenhauerReproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe conservative management for accessory and cavitated uterine mass (ACUM) with norethindrone acetate. The patient gave signed written, informed consent authorizing publication. Design: We present a case report of a patient with ACUM who desired delay in surgical management. Subjects: The patient initially presented as a 16-year-old. She reported menses starting at the age of 11 years with increasing chronic pain and severe dysmenorrhea over the past 5 years. She was started on norethindrone acetate (5 mg orally once a day). Her periods were completely suppressed on this initial dose, and her pain resolved. After 4 years of conservative management, the patient requested definitive surgical management at the age of 20 years. Main Outcome Measures: Abdominal surgery was performed 4 years after initial diagnosis after delay with norethindrone acetate. Results: Pathology from the procedure confirmed the diagnosis of ACUM. Conclusion: On the basis of this case report, for patients with severe pain and dysmenorrhea secondary to ACUM, norethindrone acetate suppression may be a viable option. Because the patient was asymptomatic with norethindrone acetate (5 mg orally once a day), there was no need to titrate the dose higher. However, if patients continue to have pain with the starting regimen, it is reasonable to titrate the dose up to the maximum dose of norethindrone acetate (15 mg orally once daily). Although the intention for this patient was to delay surgery, for patients who are poor surgical candidates or do not desire surgical management, norethindrone acetate may be a viable, long-term option.

Indexed as

Accessory and cavitated uterine masscase reportconservative managementnorethindrone

Identifiers

PMID40201103
PMCPMC11973823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.