ArticleF&S reports2025
Overcoming challenges in ovarian visualization: a case report of a magnetic resonance imaging-guided oocyte retrieval resulting in live birth.
Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To report a successful case of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided oocyte retrieval in a patient with challenging pelvic anatomy, extensive adhesive disease, and diminished ovarian reserve, necessitated by the inability to visualize the ovaries using transvaginal or transabdominal ultrasound. Design: Case report. Subject: A 33-year-old nulligravid woman with a history of ulcerative colitis, multiple pelvic and abdominal surgeries, and significant pelvic adhesive disease. Exposure: Controlled ovarian stimulation was initiated using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol, followed by sequential MRI and MRI-guided oocyte retrieval due to challenges in visualizing and accessing the ovaries. Main Outcome Measures: Successful oocyte retrieval under MRI guidance. Results: Two oocytes were retrieved from 5 aspirated follicles using MRI guidance. Both underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection, resulting in the development of a single blastocyst, which led to a live birth via embryo transfer to a gestational carrier. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided oocyte retrieval represents a potential technique for patients with complex pelvic anatomy or extensive adhesive disease, where traditional ultrasound-guided approaches may be inadequate. Interdisciplinary collaboration and individualized care are crucial in optimizing outcomes for patients undergoing assisted reproduction, particularly those with challenging medical histories. Further studies comparing MRI-guided and traditional ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval in challenging cases are warranted to determine the optimal approach for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.