ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Health care providers' experiences with genetic testing in patients at risk for hereditary angioedema.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Identification of additional types of hereditary angioedema (HAE) with a normal level of C1 esterase inhibitor has highlighted the role of genetic testing in the diagnosis and management of HAE. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess health care providers' (HCPs') current experiences, practices, and comfort level with genetic testing in patients at risk for HAE. Methods: A self-administered electronic questionnaire targeting HCPs working with HAE was distributed across the United States. The questionnaire consisted of 20 questions divided into sections on demographics, current practices, and perspectives on genetic testing. All statistical analyses were performed using the ordinal logistic regression model. Results: Responses were received from 54 allergist-immunologists representing 25 states. Most respondents (77.8% [21 of 27]) noted that genetic testing is part of their usual diagnostic process for a patient with recurrent angioedema. The majority (92.7% [25 of 27]) believed that genetic testing is probably or definitely helpful in the diagnosis of patients with HAE; however, many HCPs (64% [17 of 27]) noted that they were uncomfortable ordering it. HCPs reported that their top 4 barriers to ordering genetic testing included were insurance, cost, availability of genetic counseling, and knowing which test to order. Conclusions: The study found that HCPs consider genetic testing during a diagnostic workup for HAE; however, many lack confidence in ordering and/or interpreting results. The findings of this study suggest a need for (1) HCP education on the process of genetic testing in HAE; (2) increased collaboration with genetic specialists; and (3) reduction of perceived barriers to genetic testing, such as sponsored testing programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.