Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201038›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025

Peanut challenges prior to oral immunotherapy demonstrate high tolerance rates in selected patients.

Candice N Gard, Georgiana M Sanders, Ian F Slack, Charles F Schuler, George E Freigeh, Kelly M O'Shea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Candice N GardDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Georgiana M SandersDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Ian F SlackDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Charles F SchulerDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
George E FreigehDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Kelly M O'SheaDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.

Funding

The role of epithelial barrier dysfunction in food anaphylaxisK23AI162661 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Charles F Schuler · 2022 to 2026
$972k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI162661NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI171988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peanut oral immunotherapy (pOIT) protocols typically remain below the threshold for reaction during the initial dose escalation (IDE) day. However, some patients may have higher thresholds for reaction or may not have an ongoing peanut allergy. Objective: We sought to characterize the response to an accelerated initial dose escalation (A-IDE) for qualifying low-risk peanut-allergic patients younger than 4 years in which IDE progressed to a full peanut oral food challenge as tolerated. Methods: Records of 76 pOIT patients younger than 4 years were reviewed. Those with history of peanut reaction with peanut allergy testing of less than 95% positive predictive value for failed oral food challenge were offered an A-IDE. A-IDE proceeded stepwise until patients refused dosing, any reaction occurred, or they tolerated the challenge (cumulative dose: 4000 mg peanut protein). If the A-IDE was not tolerated, patients completed pOIT. Results: From April 2022 to February 2024, 16 patients participated in an A-IDE. Eleven (68.8%) tolerated the 4000 mg cumulative dose, demonstrating resolution of their peanut allergy. The remaining had mild symptoms not requiring epinephrine. Mean pOIT starting dose following A-IDE was 450 mg (vs 25 mg in standard pOIT). Maintenance dosing was reached with a mean of 5.2 visits (vs 9.7 in standard pOIT). Conclusions: Nearly 70% of low-risk patients younger than 4 years with previous diagnosis of peanut allergy tolerated a full peanut serving when initiating pOIT. This indicates the importance of diagnostic peanut challenge to selected patients before initiating OIT.

Indexed as

Food allergyoral food challengeoral immunotherapypeanut

Identifiers

PMID40201038
PMCPMC11978367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.