ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
Peanut challenges prior to oral immunotherapy demonstrate high tolerance rates in selected patients.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pragmatic Strategies for Reducing Variability and Risk in Food Oral Immunotherapy.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Peanut oral immunotherapy (pOIT) protocols typically remain below the threshold for reaction during the initial dose escalation (IDE) day. However, some patients may have higher thresholds for reaction or may not have an ongoing peanut allergy. Objective: We sought to characterize the response to an accelerated initial dose escalation (A-IDE) for qualifying low-risk peanut-allergic patients younger than 4 years in which IDE progressed to a full peanut oral food challenge as tolerated. Methods: Records of 76 pOIT patients younger than 4 years were reviewed. Those with history of peanut reaction with peanut allergy testing of less than 95% positive predictive value for failed oral food challenge were offered an A-IDE. A-IDE proceeded stepwise until patients refused dosing, any reaction occurred, or they tolerated the challenge (cumulative dose: 4000 mg peanut protein). If the A-IDE was not tolerated, patients completed pOIT. Results: From April 2022 to February 2024, 16 patients participated in an A-IDE. Eleven (68.8%) tolerated the 4000 mg cumulative dose, demonstrating resolution of their peanut allergy. The remaining had mild symptoms not requiring epinephrine. Mean pOIT starting dose following A-IDE was 450 mg (vs 25 mg in standard pOIT). Maintenance dosing was reached with a mean of 5.2 visits (vs 9.7 in standard pOIT). Conclusions: Nearly 70% of low-risk patients younger than 4 years with previous diagnosis of peanut allergy tolerated a full peanut serving when initiating pOIT. This indicates the importance of diagnostic peanut challenge to selected patients before initiating OIT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.