ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2024
An Ethical Approach to Genomic Privacy Preserving Technology Development.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population genetic variation characterised through serial independent pool-seq: the Cyprus Genome Project.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Genomic Medicine and Individual Autonomy: Reflections on Knowledge Societies and Governmentality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Demand for genomic research data and genetic testing results from cancer patients has grown exponentially. When a patient is diagnosed with a hereditary cancer syndrome, standard practice is for providers to encourage patients to discuss their results with their relatives and encourage those relatives to have clinical genetic testing and possibly participate in genetic research. Genomic research data and genetic testing results are being shared and connected in ways never imagined. Genomic data sharing is critical for advancing precision health and increasing diversity in global genome databases. However, these advancements often come with undesirable consequences, which call for additional privacy safeguards and research practices to protect hereditary cancer patients and their families because relatives who may have genomic information in common with the patient causing privacy risks to ripple throughout a kinship network. We propose to address this gap using an interdisciplinary approach integrating bioethical principles (autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, respect for persons, and equity) with data science techniques to mitigate privacy risk challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.