Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Returning individual wearable sensor results to participants: perspectives on challenges and lessons learned.

Krista S Leonard-Corzo, Shelby L Bachman, Jennifer M Blankenship, Ieuan Clay, Kate Lyden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krista S Leonard-CorzoVivoSense, Inc., Newport Coast, CA, United States.
Shelby L BachmanVivoSense, Inc., Newport Coast, CA, United States.
Jennifer M BlankenshipVivoSense, Inc., Newport Coast, CA, United States.
Ieuan ClayVivoSense, Inc., Newport Coast, CA, United States.
Kate LydenVivoSense, Inc., Newport Coast, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increased adoption of digital health technologies in clinical trials, sponsors and investigators are often faced with the challenge of promoting participant compliance and engagement. One strategy that may provide value to participants and, as such, help improve compliance with digital health technologies is to return individual study results to participants. Clinical research participants have consistently expressed their desire to receive individual study results following participation in a trial, and trial sponsors and investigators are eager to comply. However, multiple challenges and barriers to its implementation mean that return of results is rarely carried out, despite alignment around its value. This perspective discusses the potential benefits of returning individual study results, including improved participant engagement and compliance, increased patient trust, and increased sense of health ownership. We also discuss the practical challenges of and barriers to returning individual study results from digital health technologies back to participants related to what, how, and when to return results. We assert that clinical trial sponsors and investigators should consider returning individual study results to participants and propose potential solutions to address specific challenges.

Indexed as

patient centricityresearch disseminationreturn of resultstransparencywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID40200993
PMCPMC11975874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.