Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200984›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

High-resolution analyses of the secretomes from murine C2C12 cells and primary human skeletal muscle cells reveal distinct differences in contraction-regulated myokine secretion.

Pia Marlene Förster, Julian Hogenkamp, Moira Fee Pottgießer, Christian Binsch, Awovi Didi Humpert, Carolin Laura Brügge, Michelle Isabel Deatc, Regina Ensenauer, Alexandra Chadt, G Hege Thoresen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pia Marlene FörsterInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Julian HogenkampInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Moira Fee PottgießerInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian BinschInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Awovi Didi HumpertInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Carolin Laura BrüggeInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michelle Isabel DeatcInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Regina EnsenauerInstitute of Child Nutrition, Max Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Alexandra ChadtInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
G Hege ThoresenSection for Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
D Margriet OuwensInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sonja HartwigInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefan LehrInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hadi Al-HasaniInstitute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myokines released by skeletal muscle in response to contraction may contribute to the health-promoting effects of exercise. Previous studies with cultured rodent and human myotubes have revealed highly complex patterns of myokine secretion. However, the commonalities and differences in the secretory response of the different cell models have not been explored, limiting the interpretation of these results. In the present study, we performed a comprehensive analysis of contraction-regulated secretomes using the most commonly used skeletal muscle cell models, cultured murine C2C12 myotubes and satellite cell-derived primary human myotubes (HSkMC). The cells were subjected to low-frequency electrical pulse stimulation (EPS) for 6 h followed by high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of secreted proteins in the culture medium. We identified 5,710 and 3,285 proteins in the secretomes of C2C12 myotubes and HSkMC, with 80% of human myokines also detected in the murine secretome. Additionally, we found 518 and 336 secreted proteins that were differentially regulated during contraction in murine and human cells, respectively, along with 1,440 and 385 previously unknown potential myokines secreted by murine and human myotubes. Bioinformatic prediction analyses revealed that the majority of the newly identified myokines were secreted via unconventional protein secretion pathways (UPS) in the murine secretome, whereas most novel proteins in the human secretome were secreted via the classical endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-to-Golgi pathway. Moreover, ontology analysis indicates cell type-specific differences in cellular compartments involved in myokine secretion. Collectively, our results provide a comprehensive overview of the secretomes of two of the most commonly used cell models and may provide guidance for further studies of myokines.

Indexed as

C2C12EPSHSkMCsmass spectrometrymuscle contractionmyokinessecretomes

Identifiers

PMID40200984
PMCPMC11975866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.