Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200942›Full record

ReviewJournal of biological methods2025

Analgesic efficacy of parasternal intercostal plane block for midline sternotomy in adult cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Heitor J S Medeiros, Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigue, Ariel Mueller, Elizabeth Korn, A Sassan Sabouri

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biological methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07315308 (Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block Reduces Intraoperative Opioid Consumption in Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Median Sternotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07315308 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block Reduces Intraoperative Opioid Consumption in Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Via Median Sternotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGaziantep City HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Sternotomy, Opioid Consumption, Intraoperative Pain ControlArmsDeep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block, Standard Multimodal Analgesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block and Full Sternotomy; A Randomized Trial.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heitor J S MedeirosDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States of America.
Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca RodrigueDepartment of Medicine, Positivo University, 81280-330 Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Ariel MuellerDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States of America.
Elizabeth KornDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States of America.
A Sassan SabouriDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regional anesthesia is widely supported as a part of multimodal analgesia for post-operative pain management following cardiac surgery. A common technique for managing post-sternotomy pain is the parasternal intercostal plane (PIP) block, which involves injecting anesthetics into the fascial planes near the sternum to block the anterior cutaneous branches of the T2 - T6 nerves. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effects of PIP blocks on post-sternotomy pain, narcotic usage, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and extubation time following adult cardiac surgeries. Methodology: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating PIP blocks in adult cardiac surgery with midline sternotomy. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase through February 22, 2023. The risk of bias (ROB) in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane ROB tool, version 2. Twelve RCTs involving 819 adult patients were included. Primary outcomes were pain scores at 12 and 24 h post-surgery and narcotic usage in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes included extubation time and ICU stay. Results: The PIP block group had significantly lower pain scores at 12 (mean difference [MD]: -1.21 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.17, -0.25, Conclusion: PIP blocks provided effective analgesia and reduced ICU stay in cardiac surgery patients requiring sternotomy, but due to study heterogeneity, results should be interpreted with caution. Future research is warranted to explore its short- and long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute painCardiac surgeryMedian sternotomyPain managementRegional anesthesiaUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40200942
PMCPMC11973045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.