ArticleTransfusion2025
The feasibility of monitoring trauma patients with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating Blood Volume Loss With Wireless, Wearable Ultrasound: A Pilot Investigation.Military medicine · 2026Article
- Using a Stifneck Select CollarTM for hands-free semiautomatic blood flow measurements: A user study.PloS one · 2026Article
- The feasibility of monitoring trauma patients with a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of reduced stroke volume (SV) or cardiac output (CO) may expedite resuscitative interventions during traumatic hemorrhage; corrected carotid artery flow time (ccFT) has been proposed as a surrogate for SV during blood volume loss. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the feasibility of using a wireless, wearable Doppler ultrasound capable of measuring ccFT in traumatically injured patients at a level 1 trauma center. A convenience sample of 33 patients was enrolled. We assessed device placement, data transfer and capture, and signal quality by assessing the ability to capture at least 15 consecutive cardiac cycles in the minute prior to blood pressure monitor cycling. A post hoc analysis examined ccFT variations between transfused and non-transfused patients.
resultsDevice placement succeeded in 94% of patients (n = 31) and the data were captured and transferred from all 31. The consecutive cardiac cycles before blood pressure measurement exceeded 15 (p = .015) in 93% of patients (n = 28). We observed ccFT below 270 ms and longer time spent under this threshold during resuscitation in transfused patients. Patients with low ccFT experienced more severe injuries and longer hospital and ICU stays. DISCUSSION: This is the first study that demonstrates the feasibility of using a wearable Doppler ultrasound in trauma patients on admission to the trauma bay. Although findings suggest that ccFT could serve as an early marker of hemodynamic compromise, further large-scale, multicenter studies are needed to validate its predictive value and clinical utility in guiding trauma resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.