ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2025
Antibiotics and Uterine Flushing versus Antibiotics Alone for Chronic Endometritis with Thin Endometrium in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunometabolic-uterine-ovarian interactions and flushing therapy in dairy cows: a narrative review.Veterinary world · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate whether uterine cavity flushing combined with antibiotic administration, improves the outcomes of assisted reproductive technology for patients with thin endometrium (<7 mm) associated with chronic endometritis. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 202 patients. Subsequently, a single frozen-thawed embryo of high morphological quality (≥4AB) was transferred either in an artificial cycle or on day 7 after the luteinizing hormone (LH) peak in the natural cycle. The parameters measured included the number of CD138-positive plasma cells in the endometrial stroma, endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR).
resultsFollowing treatment with endometrial flushing and antibiotics (group 1), there was a significant increase in endometrial thickness compared to antibiotics alone (group 2): 9.93 ± 1.37 mm vs. 8.2 ± 0.4 mm (P<0.001). Additionally, there was a significant reduction in the number of CD138-positive plasma cells in the endometrial stroma: 0.4 ± 0.8 vs. 4.1 ± 5.2 (P<0.001). The CPR with high-quality ET was 68.6 vs. 48%, respectively (P=0.016). The take-home baby rate was 60.8 vs. 39%, respectively (P=0.002).
conclusionTherapy for chronic endometritis, which includes uterine flushing along with antibacterial treatment, when compared with the standard treatment method, resulted in a significant reduction in the clinical symptoms of chronic endometritis (CE) and can enhance the effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.