ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2025
Efficacy of Hyoscine N-butyl Bromide on Cervical Dilatation Prior to Hysteroscopy Procedure: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the high prevalence of intrauterine pathologies, postmenopausal women are more eligible for hysteroscopy procedure. Cervical dilatation is always a major challenge for performing hysteroscopy. The present study aimed to determine the efficacy of vaginal Hyoscine N-butylbromide (HBB) on cervical dilatation prior to hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted on postmenopausal women who were scheduled for hysteroscopy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned with a ratio of 1:1 to the intervention (received 20 mg HBB vaginally two hours prior to hysteroscopy) and control (did not receive HBB) groups. As the study outcomes, pre-hysteroscopy cervical dilatation (based on the passage of the dilator number 4 through the cervical canal) and the adverse event consequences were compared between the two groups.
resultsOverall, 128 postmenopausal women who were eligible for hysteroscopy were included in the study, with 64 individuals in each group. The percentage of cervical dilatation in the intervention group was significantly higher than the control group (100 vs. 70.3%, P<0.001). Furthermore, none of the adverse event consequences differed significantly between the intervention and control groups: bleeding (3.1 vs. 3.1%, P>0.999), nausea and vomiting (4.7 vs. 0%, P=0.244), dry mouth (3.1 vs. 0%, P=0.496), dizziness (0 vs. 0%), and headache (0 vs. 0%).
conclusionBased on the findings, vaginal HBB is effective without any significant side effects in cervical dilation of postmenopausal women (registration number: IRCT20220822055772N1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.