Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200766›Full record

SynthesisPharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2025

Association Between β-Adrenoreceptor Agonists and Antagonists and Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Agnieszka Szmigiel, Miguel Monteiro da Rocha, Kate Browne, Daniel Morales, David Benee Olsen, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Ian Douglas, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Helena Carreira

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Agnieszka SzmigielPharmacovigilance Office, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6049-9634
Miguel Monteiro da RochaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kate BrowneMedical and Health Information Service, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daniel MoralesReal World Evidence, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
David Benee OlsenDepartment of Pharmacovigilance, Norwegian Medical Products Agency, Oslo, Norway.
Charlotte Warren-GashFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ian DouglasFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Krishnan BhaskaranFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helena CarreiraFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1538-2526

Funding

Funding: No specific funding was received for this study. Professor Bhaskaran is funded by a Wellcome Senior Research Fellowship (grant number 220283/Z/20/Z). Professor Warren-Gash is funded by a Wellcome Career Development Award (225868/Z/22/Z). Professor Douglas holds grants from NIHR, GSK, and AIR@InnoHK administered by Innovation and Technology Commission.Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundβ-agonists and β-antagonists are among the most prescribed drugs worldwide. In 2018, studies suggesting a harmful association between propranolol and Parkinson's disease (PD) prompted a signal procedure by the European Medicines Agency's safety committee, which concluded with no update of product information. Several studies have been published since then. We aimed to systematically review, critically appraise, and meta-analyse all studies on the association between the use of β-antagonists (including propranolol) and β-agonists, and the risk of PD.

methodsWe searched Embase and Medline up to December 2024 for observational and intervention studies that reported relative risk estimates of the association between use of these medicines and PD. Two reviewers screened the records, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The restricted maximum likelihood method was used to compute pooled effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsTwenty-two studies were eligible. Overall, 20 had a high risk of bias in at least one domain. Twelve studies had medium to high risk of outcome misclassification. Of the 14 studies concerning β-antagonists, eleven had an unclear or high risk of protopathic bias, as propranolol is indicated for the treatment of essential tremor. Control for confounding by socio-economic status, area of residence (urban/rural), and smoking (a protective factor against PD) was deficient or lacking in 9/22, 15/22, and 12/22 studies, respectively. Lag times were applied in 9/22 studies. In meta-analysis, the summary relative risk (RR) of PD was 1.41 (95% CI: 1.18-1.68) for the class of β-antagonists (12 studies) and 0.93 (0.84-1.03) for β2-agonists (11 studies). Among specific β-antagonists, the summary RR of PD was 2.36 (1.66-3.36) for propranolol (7 studies), 0.84 (0.80-0.88) for carvedilol (3 studies) and 1.02 (0.87-1.18) for metoprolol (4 studies). For specific β2-agonists, summary RR was 0.88 (0.77-1.01) for salbutamol (7 studies), 0.91 (0.88-0.95) for short-acting β2-agonists (6 studies), and 0.85 (0.76-0.96) for long-acting β2 agonists (5 studies). Restricting to subgroups based on quality criteria resulted in weaker or non-statistically significant associations.

conclusionThe quality and quantity of the available evidence do not support a causal association between use of β-adrenoreceptor modulators and PD. Significant associations are most likely explained by protopathic bias and confounding.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsParkinson DiseaseHumansPropranololAdrenergic beta-AgonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsPropranololadrenergic beta‐agonistsadrenergic beta‐antagonistsParkinson's diseasesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40200766
PMCPMC11979683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.