Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200656›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology journal2025

Planning evaluation of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiosurgery for kidney tumors close to the organ at risk: is it valuable to wait for good timing to perform stereotactic radiosurgery?

Takaya Yamamoto, Shohei Tanaka, Noriyoshi Takahashi, Rei Umezawa, Yu Suzuki, Keita Kishida, So Omata, Kazuya Takeda, Hinako Harada, Kiyokazu Sato and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takaya YamamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shohei TanakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Noriyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Rei UmezawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yu SuzukiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Keita KishidaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
So OmataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kazuya TakedaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hinako HaradaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kiyokazu SatoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KatsutaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Noriyuki KadoyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate changes in target coverage using magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgoART) for kidney tumors and to evaluate the suitable timing of treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsAmong patients treated with 3-fraction MRgoART for kidney cancer, 18 tumors located within 1 cm of the gastrointestinal tract were selected. Stereotactic radiosurgery planning with a prescription dose of 26 Gy was performed using pretreatment simulation and three MRgoART timings with an adapt-to-shape method. The best MRgoART plan was defined as the plan achieving the highest percentage of planning target volume (PTV) coverage of 26 Gy. In clinical scenario simulation, MRgoART plans were evaluated in the order of actual treatment. Waiting for the next timing was done when the PTV coverage of 26 Gy did not achieve 95%-99% or did not increase by 5% or more compared to the pretreatment plan.

resultsThe median percentages of PTV receiving 26 Gy in pretreatment and the first, second, and third MRgoART were 82% (range, 19%), 63% (range, 7% to 99%), 88% (range, 31% to 99%), and 95% (range, 3% to 99%), respectively. Comparing pretreatment simulation plans with the best MRgoART plans showed a significant difference (p = 0.025). In the clinical scenario simulation, 16 of the 18 planning series, including nine plans with 95%-99% PTV coverage of 26 Gy and seven plans with increased PTV coverage by 5% or more, would be irradiated at a good timing.

conclusionMRgoART revealed dose coverage differences at each MRgoART timing. Waiting for optimal irradiation timing could be an option in case of suboptimal timing.

Indexed as

Kidney cancerMR-guided online adaptive radiotherapyMR-LinacRadiotherapyRadiotherapy planningStereotactic technique

Identifiers

PMID40200656
PMCPMC12010889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.