Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200496›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2025

Patient Experiences with Virtual Nursing: A Qualitative Survey.

Saif Khairat, Jennifer Morelli, Ariana Avila, Barbara S Edson, Christopher Shea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saif KhairatUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Jennifer MorelliUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Ariana AvilaUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Barbara S EdsonUNC Health, Morrisville, NC.
Christopher SheaUniversity of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

Center for Virtual Care Value and Excellence (ViVE). RC2TR004380 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Saif Khairat · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS RC2 TR004380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual nursing is a novel nursing model of care that utilizes experienced nurses providing nursing care remotely using telehealth technologies. This qualitative study focuses on patient experiences after using virtual nursing to complete hospital admission assessments or discharge education. Overall, patients reported mostly neutral or positive experiences with virtual nursing, with only 13% of quotes identified as having negative sentiments. This paper provides valuable insights into how patients perceive virtual nursing, including patient acceptance, the advantages of using virtual nursing, and patient perceptions.

Indexed as

Nursing CarePatient SatisfactionTelemedicineUser-Computer InterfaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAssessmentNursingTelehealthVideoconferencingVirtual

Identifiers

PMID40200496
PMCPMC12959351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.