ArticleMilitary Medical Research2025
Endovascular treatment for cerebral venous thrombosis: a multicenter study in China.
Article in Military Medical Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Screening rates and geographical disparities shape venous thromboembolism risk after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Integrated Multi-Omics Identifies Core Molecular Targets in Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis-Induced Brain Injury.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Impact of emergency medical services on the prognosis in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving reperfusion therapy or usual treatment: a prospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Pathophysiologic Insights, Clinical Evaluation Tools, and Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Implementation outcomes of a VTE prevention and management system within the close-knit county medical alliance model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Cerebral venous thrombosis: Current management, recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular treatment (EVT) is gaining popularity for the management of severe forms of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), but the evidence supporting its efficacy and safety is limited.
methodsThis multicenter study included patients with CVT admitted to 104 hospitals in 31 provinces/cities in China between January 2018 and June 2022. Propensity score weighting models were used to adjust baseline confounding variables to determine the association of EVT on the primary outcome of good functional status, defined as score 0 - 1 on the modified Rankin Scale after hospital discharge.
resultsOf 3063 patients identified through hospital records searches, 2774 adults [age (42 ± 15.8) years, female 50.3%] fulfilled eligibility criteria and agreed to be included, of whom 449 (16.2%) received EVT and 2325 (83.8%) received standard care. There was no significant difference between the EVT group and the standard care group in terms of the possibility of good functional recovery [weighted risk ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 - 1.03]. Similarly, there was no difference in the likelihood of death at hospital discharge (weighted risk ratio = 1.91, 95% CI 0.91 - 3.68). In subgroup analysis, the possibility of good functional recovery was lower in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (weighted risk ratio = 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 - 0.98; P for interaction = 0.01) and seizures (weighted risk ratio = 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 - 0.95; P for interaction = 0.03).
conclusionIn this large nationwide study, EVT was not associated with improved functional outcomes compared to standard care in patients with CVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.