ArticleMobile DNA2025
Transposable element dynamics in Xenopus laevis embryogenesis: a tale of two coexisting subgenomes.
Article in Mobile DNA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The African clawed frog Xenopus laevis has an allotetraploid genome consisting of two subgenomes referred as L relating to the Long chromosomes and S relating to the Short chromosomes. While the L subgenome presents conserved synteny with X. tropicalis chromosomes, the S subgenome has undergone rearrangements and deletions leading to differences in gene and transposable element (TE) content between the two subgenomes. The asymmetry in the evolution of the two subgenomes is also detectable in gene expression levels and TE mobility. TEs, also known as "jumping genes", are mobile genetic elements having a key role in genome evolution and gene regulation. However, due to their potential deleterious effects, TEs are controlled by host defense mechanisms such as the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complex and the Argonaute proteins that mainly modify the heterochromatin environment. In embryogenesis, TEs can escape the silencing mechanisms during the maternal-to-zygotic transition when a transcriptionally permissive environment is created. Moreover, further evidence highlighted that the reactivation of TEs during early developmental stages is not the result of this genome-wide reorganization of chromatin but it is class and stage-specific, suggesting a precise regulation. In line with these premises, we explored the impact of TE transcriptional contribution in six developmental stages of X. laevis. Overall, the expression pattern referred to the entire set of transcribed TEs was constant across the six developmental stages and in line with their abundance in the genome. However, focusing on subgenome-specific TEs, our analyses revealed a distinctive transcriptional pattern dominated by LTR retroelements in the L subgenome and LINE retroelements in the S subgenome attributable to young copies. Interestingly, genes encoding proteins involved in maintaining the repressive chromatin environment were active in both subgenomes highlighting that TE controlling systems were active in X. laevis embryogenesis and evolved symmetrically.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.