Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200358›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

Landscape analyses of gaps in reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health policies and guidelines to catalyse policy implementation improvement in Uganda.

Charles Ibingira, Josaphat Byamugisha, Elizeus Rutebemberwa, Lynn Atuyambe, Richard Mugahi, Emmanuel Odongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles IbingiraSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. cibingira@gmail.com.
Josaphat ByamugishaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Kampala, Uganda.
Elizeus RutebemberwaSchool of Public Health, Dep. of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Lynn AtuyambeSchool of Public Health, Dep. of Community Health, and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Richard MugahiReproductive and Child Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Emmanuel OdongoMakerere University Hospital, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. odmanuel@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite many improvements in maternal, newborn, sexual, and reproductive health (RMNCAH) in sub-Saharan Africa, the overall progress remains inadequate and uneven. Some of the reasons for this include fragmented healthcare systems, gaps in evidence-based policy, inadequate investment and funding for health, and weaknesses in policy dissemination and implementation. Current stakeholder views on RMNCAH policy formulation and policy implementation in Uganda has not been exhaustively studied to help inform adjustments in policy formulation approaches and implementation strategies. The objective was to conduct a situation analysis to identify gaps in RMNCAH policies and guidelines formulation, dissemination, and implementation in Uganda to be able to recommend strategies to address these gaps, and catalyse policy formulation and implementation.

methodsThis was an exploratory qualitative study conducted among RMNCAH stakeholders at central level and four district local governments in Uganda. Data were collected through review of RMNCAH policies and guideline documents using a document review guide, two guided small-group discussions (SGDs) with central government stakeholders and partners, four SGDs with district health teams (DHTs), eight key informant interviews (KIIs), and four focus group discussions (FGDs) with women 20-35 years of age. The interviews and group discussions were conducted using pretested interview guides, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analysed by thematic analysis using open code software.

resultsIt was established that the policy and guideline documents addressing most of RMNCAH components existed. However, the indicators have not improved adequately to meet the international targets. The main policy implementation gaps reported revolved around policy leadership and coordination such as weaknesses in district and facility leadership and management, insufficient monitoring and evaluation, inadequate community engagement in policy formulation and implementation, inadequate policy and guidelines dissemination, limited multisectoral approach, and insufficient resource allocation to implement the policies and guidelines.

conclusionPolicies and guidelines covering all RMNCAH components are in place, but implementing and translating these into improved indicators has been the major challenge. A strategic framework should be developed to test interventions to address these gaps to catalyse policy implementation in selected districts and later be rolled out to cover the whole country to cause wholesome policy impact.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal HealthPolicy MakingReproductive HealthAdolescentAdolescent HealthAdultChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyQualitative ResearchGapsPolicy formulationPolicy implementationRMNCAH

Identifiers

PMID40200358
PMCPMC11978148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.