ReviewJournal of cheminformatics2025
A beginner's approach to deep learning applied to VS and MD techniques.
Review in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and ultra-high performance computing methods and experiments for drug discovery: virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulations, ADMET modelling, and experimental validation.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Geometric Deep Learning-Based Drug Design Models for Small-Molecule Drug Discovery.Molecular informatics · 2026Review
- Differentiation of RNA-protein docking structures through molecular dynamics simulation and machine learning methods.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Editorial: Exploring molecular recognition: integrating experimental and computational approaches.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has become impossible to imagine the fields of biochemistry and medicinal chemistry without computational chemistry and molecular modelling techniques. In many steps of the drug development process in silico methods have become indispensable. Virtual screening (VS) can tremendously expedite the early discovery phase, whilst the use of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations forms a powerful additional tool to in vitro methods throughout the entire drug discovery process. In the field of biochemistry, MD has also become a compelling method for studying biophysical systems (e.g., protein folding) complementary to experimental techniques. However, both VS and MD come with their own limitations and methodological difficulties, from hardware limitations to restrictions in algorithmic capabilities. One solution to overcoming these difficulties lies in the field of machine learning (ML), and more specifically deep learning (DL). There are many ways in which DL can be applied to these molecular modelling techniques to achieve more accurate results in a more efficient manner or expedite the data analysis of the acquired results. Despite steadily increasing interest in DL amidst computational chemists, knowledge is still limited and scattered over different resources. This review is aimed at computational chemists with knowledge of molecular modelling, who wish to possibly integrate DL approaches in their research and already have a basic understanding of the fundamentals of DL. This review focusses on a survey of recent applications of DL in molecular modelling techniques. The different sections are logically subdivided, based on where DL is integrated in the research: (1) for the improvement of VS workflows, (2) for the improvement of certain workflows in MD simulations, (3) for aiding in the calculations of interatomic forces, or (4) for data analysis of MD trajectories. It will become clear that DL has the capacity to completely transform the way molecular modelling is carried out.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.