Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200318›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Results of the preclinical multicenter randomized controlled paclitaxel-induced neuropathy prevention replication study (PINPRICS).

Wolfgang Boehmerle, Tim Hagenacker, Markus Leo, Linda-Isabell Schmitt, Helmar C Lehmann, Ines Klein, Regina Stegherr, Frank Konietschke, Matthias Endres, Petra Huehnchen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wolfgang BoehmerleKlinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. wolfgang.boehmerle@charite.de.
Tim HagenackerDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Science, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Markus LeoDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Science, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Linda-Isabell SchmittDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Science, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
Helmar C LehmannDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Ines KleinDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Köln, Germany.
Regina StegherrInstitut für Biometrie und Klinische Epidemiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Frank KonietschkeInstitut für Biometrie und Klinische Epidemiologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias Endres *Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Petra Huehnchen *Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent and serious side effect of many cytotoxic drugs, including paclitaxel. Despite the identification of treatment options in animal models, clinical trials for the treatment or prevention of CIPN have been negative. Major challenges for successful clinical translation of preclinical data include a lack of reproducibility and randomization, small sample sizes and insufficient statistical tests. We therefore conducted a confirmatory, preclinical multicenter randomized controlled replication trial to test the safety and efficacy of three drugs for preventing paclitaxel-induced polyneuropathy: (1) nilotinib, (2) lithium carbonate and (3) interleukin-6-neutralizing antibodies. We preregistered the data analysis plan as well as the two-step study protocol: the optimal doses of the three compounds were assessed first and then tested in a mouse breast cancer xenograft model to compare safety and efficacy.

resultsUnfortunately, toxicity of intraperitoneally administered nilotinib in combination with paclitaxel was observed, and higher-than-expected tumor growth resulted in a lack of power when the trial was analyzed. Thus, although lithium carbonate and IL-6-neutralizing antibodies tended toward neuroprotection, the differences between these groups were not statistically significant. However, the PINPRICS study ultimately still provides important lessons with regard to the planning and conduction of multicenter preclinical trials.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicLithium CarbonatePaclitaxelPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPyrimidinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansInterleukin-6Interleukin-6 InhibitorsMiceXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntibodies, NeutralizingAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicInterleukin-6Interleukin-6 InhibitorsLithium CarbonatenilotinibPaclitaxelPyrimidinesChemotherapy-induced polyneuropathyNeuropathic painNeuroprotectionPreclinical replication study

Identifiers

PMID40200318
PMCPMC11978143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.