ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
A novel classification for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors and a predictive nomogram for nonunion following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- [Effectiveness of additional anti-rotation steel plate assisted intramedullary nail technology in aseptic femoral non-union].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough intramedullary nailing has been established as the gold standard for treating femoral shaft fractures, nonunion following intramedullary nailing remains a major concern for clinicians, severely affecting patients' walking ability and quality of life. Presently, there are certain controversies and deficiencies in nonunion classification and treatment. Herein, we propose a novel classification system for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing based on X-ray-assessed nailing morphology and stability. Furthermore, we sought to explore the new classification's clinical significance and management implications.
methodsThis retrospective study involved the analysis of clinical data collected from 82 patients with aseptic bone nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures between 2010 and 2022. The patients were classified into four groups based on intramedullary nailing stability and bone defect existence, as revealed in X-ray images. The four classifications were as follows: Type I (intramedullary nailing is stable without bone defect), Type II (intramedullary nailing is stable with bone defect), Type III (intramedullary nailing is not stable without bone defect), and Type IV (intramedullary nailing is not stable with bone defect). Based on the novel classifications, we introduced individualized treatment methods. Type I patients underwent dynamization, and Type II patients received bone grafting and plate fixation. Type III patients underwent larger intramedullary nail exchange or plate fixation, and Type IV patients received larger intramedullary nail exchange and plate fixation with bone graft or double plate fixation with bone graft. Data on relevant indicators were collected.
resultsAll patients recovered well with no complications. The average surgery times for Types I-IV were 0.4 ± 0.1, 0.8 ± 0.2, 1.1 ± 0.4, and 1.6 ± 0.4 h, respectively. Furthermore, the mean blood loss volumes for Types I-IV were 23.4 ± 4.8, 53.3 ± 8.4, 56.3 ± 7.9, and 125.2 ± 10.8 ml, respectively. The average bone healing time of all 82 patients was 5.1 ± 1.5 months. On the other hand, the mean bone healing times for Types I-IV were 4.6 ± 1.1, 4.7 ± 1.1, 5.1 ± 1.5, and 5.7 ± 1.8 months, respectively. Furthermore, the LEFS scores for Types I-IV were 68.7 ± 3.5, 69.8 ± 3.1, 66.8 ± 3.8, and 68.6 ± 2.9 points, respectively. The mean surgery time and bleeding volume increased gradually from Types I to IV (p < 0.05) but with no significant difference between Types II and III. Moreover, there were no statistical differences in fracture healing times, LEFS scores, age, and nonunion durations across the four classifications.
conclusionsThe proposed novel classification system could achieve accurate diagnosis and guidance for clinical management of aseptic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing. The corresponding individualized treatment approaches could improve prognostic outcomes and healing rates and alleviate postoperative complications. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.