ArticleBMC surgery2025
Impact of esketamine intravenous analgesic pump on pain and depression post-cesarean.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ketamine and esketamine during breastfeeding: a systematic review of human pharmacokinetic, infant and lactation outcomes.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Adult Post-operative Mental Health Outcomes Following Abdominal and Orthopedic Surgeries: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Reply to: prophylactic esketamine to reduce postpartum depression in primiparae: A multicentre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial.European journal of anaesthesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pain and psychological well-being in postpartum women following cesarean section are critical for optimal maternal recovery. Traditional analgesics often have limitations and side effects, prompting the need for alternative solutions. This study evaluates the impact of an esketamine intravenous analgesic pump on postoperative pain and psychological status in postpartum women following cesarean section.
methodsA comprehensive retrospective evaluation was conducted at our institution from October 2021 to July 2023, including 168 patients who underwent cesarean delivery. The observation group (n = 82) received esketamine via an intravenous analgesic pump, while the control group (n = 86) received traditional analgesic therapy. Data collected included demographic information, surgical details, postoperative pain (assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, VAS), psychological status (assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS), recovery metrics, and adverse reactions.
resultsThe observation group demonstrated consistently lower VAS scores at all postoperative time points compared to the control group, indicating superior pain control. EPDS scores were significantly lower in the observation group at 3, 5, and 14 days postoperatively, suggesting better psychological outcomes. The incidence of postpartum depression was also lower in the observation group at 3, 5, and 14 days. Recovery metrics such as time to first ambulation, first flatus, and initiation of lactation were significantly improved in the observation group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups.
conclusionsThe use of the Esketamine Intravenous Analgesic Pump significantly reduces postoperative pain and the incidence of postpartum depression within the first 14 days. It promotes early recovery and breastfeeding in postpartum women without significant adverse reactions, making it a valuable addition to postoperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.