ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Anesthesia depth prediction from drug infusion history using hybrid AI.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Autonomic Signature-Driven Anesthesia Depth Monitoring with Biomimetic Wearable ECG and Knowledge Graph-Augmented Deep Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology: A Multicenter Retrospective Comparison Between Human Anesthetic Decisions and Algorithmic Recommendations in Non-Cardiac Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Theoretical applications of artificial intelligence in smart infusion pump technology: Expert panel insights.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence in anesthesiology prediction models: bridging the gap from black-box algorithms to clinical decision support.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Advancing a Hybrid Decision-Making Model in Anesthesiology: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Setting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurately predicting the depth of anesthesia is essential for ensuring patient safety and optimizing surgical outcomes. Traditional regression-based approaches often struggle to model the complex and dynamic nature of patient responses to anesthetic agents. Machine learning techniques offer a promising alternative by capturing intricate relationships within physiological data. This study proposes a hybrid model integrating Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Transformer architectures, and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) to improve the predictive accuracy of anesthesia depth.
methodsThe proposed model combines multiple deep learning techniques to address different aspects of anesthesia prediction. The LSTM component captures the sequential nature of drug administration and physiological responses. The Transformer architecture utilizes attention mechanisms to enhance contextual understanding of patient data. The KAN models nonlinear relationships between drug infusion histories and anesthesia depth. The model was trained and evaluated on patient data from a publicly available anesthesia monitoring database. Performance was assessed using Mean Squared Error (MSE) and compared against other models.
resultsThe hybrid model demonstrated superior predictive performance compared to conventional regression approaches. Tested on the VitalDB database, the proposed framework achieved a MSE of 0.0062, which is lower than other methods. The inclusion of attention mechanisms and nonlinear modeling contributed to improved accuracy and robustness. The results indicate that the combined approach effectively captures the temporal and nonlinear characteristics of anesthesia depth, offering a more reliable predictive tool for clinical use.
conclusionsThis study presents a novel deep learning framework for anesthesia depth prediction, integrating sequential, attention-based, and nonlinear modeling techniques. The results suggest that this hybrid approach enhances prediction reliability and provides anesthesiologists with a more comprehensive analysis of factors influencing anesthesia depth. Future research will focus on refining model robustness, exploring real-time applications, and addressing potential biases in predictive analytics to further improve clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.