Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200233›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Neurodevelopmental problems in pre-school children in rural Western Cape, South Africa: is community screening feasible?

Ben Truter, Christopher Gillberg, Amy L Slogrove, Petra Conradie, Eva Billstedt, Lucy Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ben TruterGillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. ben@neurodiversitycentre.co.za.
Christopher GillbergGillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Amy L SlogroveDepartment of Paediatrics & Child Health, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Petra ConradieThe Neurodiversity Centre, Paarl, South Africa.
Eva BillstedtGillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lucy ThompsonGillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

ALF (agreement netween the Swedish state and county councils) ALFGBG 965080 & ALFGBG 281588Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education 2020-8857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no standard public health screening for neurodevelopmental disorders in pre-school children in South Africa. There are pragmatic challenges in implementing such a programme in under-resourced regions. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of introducing a two-stage screening model for neurodevelopmental disorders among pre-school children in the rural Western Cape, South Africa.

methodsWe adopted a mixed methods approach to evaluate the feasibility of using a brief screening questionnaire, the ESSENCE-Q, translated into local languages (Afrikaans and isiXhosa), through verbal administration to mothers of pre-school children by trained research assistants without professional health qualifications within a cross-sectional ESSENCE-Q validation study. A focus group interview with research assistants who conducted the screening was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Feedback from participating mothers was obtained through a simple verbally administered questionnaire, rating 7 items on a Likert scale. Finally, the research team's field notes were reviewed to critically assess feasibility.

resultsThe focus group interview identified areas of logistical challenge but highlighted positive reception among mothers. Since mothers generally had low levels of education and literacy, time was required to clarify certain child development concepts during screening. The in-person mode of engagement and flexibility of processes, including the use of a visual consent booklet, supported feasibility. Considerable resource limitations and trauma were encountered. Training key community members to administer the ESSENCE-Q for future studies or screening projects was considered feasible, provided neurodevelopmental training and trauma support is provided. Feedback from mothers was consistently positive, although unavoidable delays between assessment and feedback may have impacted this data. Identified challenges can be adequately addressed through practical adaptations. DISCUSSION: Thorough preparation prior to commencing screening is considered essential for feasibility, including community-based stakeholder consultation, broad consultation around translated screening questionnaires, and preparation for diagnostic assessment. Ongoing support to mother-child recipients as well as those administering the screening, is required. The experience of participating mother-child pairs must be placed at the centre of community-based screening processes. Long term sustainability requires adequate training, supervision and psychological support for those administering such processes.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningNeurodevelopmental DisordersChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMothersRural PopulationSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesChildrenESSENCENeurodevelopmentalScreeningSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40200233
PMCPMC11980325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.