Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200213›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2025

The effects of dose, valency, and affinity on TfR-mediated brain delivery in vivo.

Gillian Bonvicini, Sunitha Singh, Lisa Sandersjöö, Dag Sehlin, Stina Syvänen, Ken G Andersson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antibody-Based Biologics for CNS Disorders.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Radionuclide Selection Influences Imaging Outcomes in Immuno-PET with a Brain-Penetrating Anti-Amyloid-β Antibody.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Bispecific brain-penetrant antibodies for treatment of Alzheimer's disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gillian BonviciniBioArctic AB, Warfvinges Väg 35, 112 51, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sunitha SinghBioArctic AB, Warfvinges Väg 35, 112 51, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lisa SandersjööBioArctic AB, Warfvinges Väg 35, 112 51, Stockholm, Sweden.
Dag SehlinDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds Väg 20, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stina SyvänenDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds Väg 20, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ken G AnderssonBioArctic AB, Warfvinges Väg 35, 112 51, Stockholm, Sweden. ken.honek@bioarctic.se.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodow-ska-Curie grant agreement 813528Vetenskapsrådet 2021-01083Vetenskapsrådet 2021-03524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonovalent binding to the transferrin receptor (TfR) is considered the most efficient mode for high delivery of protein constructs across the blood-brain barrier via TfR-mediated transcytosis at therapeutic doses. However, growing evidence suggests this is not the case at lower, diagnostic doses. There is also a lack of data on how valency and affinity to TfR affect brain uptake independently since previous studies have not compared monovalent and bivalent antibodies with similar affinities regardless of valency (i.e. apparent affinity). Therefore, the aim was to evaluate the independent effects of valency and affinity on TfR-mediated brain delivery at different doses.

methodsAffinity variants of antibody 8D3 were produced by introducing alanine point mutations into the complementarity-determining regions. Eleven Fab fragments and 29 IgGs were affinity screened against mouse TfR (mTfR). Six of each were chosen for production with a knob-into-hole design to have monovalent and bivalent TfR binders in full-length antibody format. The apparent affinity of these 12 antibodies were tested in an Sp2/0-Ag14 cell assay. The 10 nM apparent affinity set and the bivalent wild-type antibody were radiolabelled and injected into wild-type mice at a low (0.22 ± 0.03 mg/kg) or high (7.5 ± 0.43 mg/kg) dose. The biodistribution was measured in brain, blood and peripheral organs 4 h post-injection.

resultsTwo sets of monovalent and bivalent 8D3 formats with similar mTfR apparent affinities were identified. Brain and tissue uptake was higher at the low dose than the high dose for all antibodies. At the low dose, the higher apparent affinity, bivalent antibody had higher brain uptake than either of the two lower apparent affinity antibodies. At the high dose, the monovalent antibody had higher brain uptake than the two bivalent antibodies. The peripheral distribution of the three antibodies were similar to the brain distribution at both doses.

conclusionsValency and apparent affinity affect brain uptake in a dose-dependent manner such that: brain uptake was affected more by apparent affinity at the low dose and by valency at the high dose. Thus, when designing constructs for TfR-mediated brain delivery, the application, and consequently the dose, are critical to consider.

Indexed as

Antibody AffinityBlood-Brain BarrierBrainReceptors, TransferrinAnimalsMiceTissue DistributionReceptors, TransferrinAntibodyApparent affinityBrain deliveryDoseTransferrin receptor-mediated transcytosisValency

Identifiers

PMID40200213
PMCPMC11980351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.